by Baphomet » Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:40 am
I think of Virtual Box of being, simply put, a 2D Solution. It won't be using your installed video card (it uses a default "virtual" graphics card and a vesa-esque sort of driver) so no fancy graphical type stuff will work (no 3D gaming, for instance) and no DirectX either. It's basically for office/desktop applications in my opinion. But, that being said, it does it really, really, REALLY well. Being able to "boot" Windows XP in a window, just like any other application, is just way freakin' cool. It kinda freaks me out, actually.
Something to think about: A Virtual Box install WILL require both the Virtual Box application itself (no too large, but significant nonetheless) AND a full install of Windows on your hard drive. This amounts to a pretty significant bit of hard-drive real estate. I only mention this so you can consider the Virtual solution, as opposed to dual-booting and how much hard-drive real-estate THAT will take -- and the how much functionality you get from each.
You lose a little functionality with the Virtual Box environment, but you gain instant access (without rebooting) to, what, 80%... 90%... of Windows functionality.
With dual-booting you get 100% of Windows functionality, but you have to reboot your system to move back and forth.
Just some points to ponder...
I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of how awesome I am...
If it's not broken, you haven't tweaked it enough.
Beginners Guide: Linux 101