Are you a spammer

Please note, that the first 3 posts you make, will need to be approved by a forum Administrator or Moderator before they are publicly viewable.
Each application to join this forum is checked at the Stop Forum Spam website. If the email or IP address appears there when checked, you will not be allowed to join this forum.
If you get past this check and post spam on this forum, your posts will be immediately deleted and your account inactivated.You will then be banned and your IP will be submitted to your ISP, notifying them of your spamming. So your spam links will only be seen for an hour or two at most. In other words, don't waste your time and ours.

This forum is for the use and enjoyment of the members and visitors looking to learn about and share information regarding the topics listed. It is not a free-for-all advertising venue. Your time would be better spent pursuing legitimate avenues of promoting your websites.

Graphics

Post your benchmarks here...


Re: Graphics

Postby Cab » Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:22 pm

Well I thought I would rerun it without killing compiz pretty happy with system

78400 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15679.883 FPS
77843 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15568.513 FPS
78366 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15673.128 FPS
78376 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15675.018 FPS
78383 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15676.587 FPS
Mother Board: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO WIFI
CPU: AMD 2700X
Memory: 32GB CORSAIR PRO RGB @3200
Video Card: EVGA GTX1080 FTW
Hard Drives: 1TB Network Drive, 1TB 860 EVO SSD, 1TB 970 EVO M.2
I'm in Southern New Mexico, USA (not Mexico)
Image
User avatar
Cab
Site Admin
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 2:06 pm
Location: New Mexico, USA
Age: 52
Operating System: Ultimate Edition Beta Tester



Re: Graphics

Postby cowboy » Wed May 07, 2008 8:41 pm

New speeds with new card
100868 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20173.520 FPS
101187 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20237.326 FPS
99335 frames in 5.0 seconds = 19866.852 FPS
99980 frames in 5.0 seconds = 19995.848 FPS
98615 frames in 5.0 seconds = 19722.971 FPS
98020 frames in 5.0 seconds = 19603.979 FPS
"Back up your Data"
"May I never lose the view of a nubie"
"Give a man a fish, he will eat for a day, teach a man how to fish , he will eat a lifetime"
Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
i5 2500k
3x4G-Skill Ripjaws
MSI GTX 560Ti Hawk..
Seagate 1TB Barracuda
NZXT 850w PS
CM Storm Sniper Case
Evga Superclock CPU Cooler
Mushkin SSD coming soon
http://acowboydave.blogspot.com/
User avatar
cowboy
U.E. God
U.E. God
 
Posts: 2625
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Scottsdale Az
Age: 67
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.2 64 BIT



Re: Graphics

Postby DaddyX3 » Wed May 07, 2008 9:02 pm

cowboy wrote:New speeds with new card
100868 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20173.520 FPS
101187 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20237.326 FPS
99335 frames in 5.0 seconds = 19866.852 FPS
99980 frames in 5.0 seconds = 19995.848 FPS
98615 frames in 5.0 seconds = 19722.971 FPS
98020 frames in 5.0 seconds = 19603.979 FPS

That is some sweet #'s!!! Cant wait to post my new #'s after the upgrade :D
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 2.5GHz 45nm/Gigabyte EP35C-DS3R M.B. w/ddr3 1333
G.Skill 2X1GB DDR3 1333MHz/Gigabyte 8800GT PCIe 2.0 512MB GDDR3 OC'd to 700Mhz/ WD160 gig, 2- WD250 gig in RAID-0 (500GB), WD640 gig e-SATA external

AMD 64 X2 3800+/ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe/G.Skill 2X1GB Matched Pair ddr400
/EVGA 6800GS Nvidia Graphics 256MB/WD160gig drive

HTPC Box:AMD 64 X2 4400+/ BIOSTAR TF7050PV HDMI MicroATX/G.Skill 2X1GB /Matched Pair DDR800/Integrated video and audio/WD160gig drive
User avatar
DaddyX3
U.E. God
U.E. God
 
Posts: 2407
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:22 am
Location: Central Coast - California
Age: 45
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 2.3 32 BIT



Re: Graphics

Postby SaddleTramp » Wed May 07, 2008 10:05 pm

ok...don't ya'll brag to hard just cuz ya beat me :lol:
nVidia GeForce 6150LE (onboard chip)

7920 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1583.864 FPS
8346 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1669.089 FPS
8369 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1673.675 FPS
8337 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1667.011 FPS
3 Rules: 1. Research; 2. Read; 3. Repeat 1 & 2
HP Pavilion a1700n; Asus A8M2N-LA; AMD Athlon X2 3800+ 2GHz; 2GB DDR2 PC2-5300 Mem; nForce 430 Chipset
GeForce GT220 1gb PCIE16
Sound Blaster Audigy2
Samsung 250GB SATA, WD 320GB SATA, WD 500GB 'GREEN' SATA
TSST DVDRW 16X DL; ASUS DRW-2014S1 DVDRW/DL 20X
Ultimate Edition 2.4 x64
Image
User avatar
SaddleTramp
U.E. God
U.E. God
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: NC, US
Age: 63
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.2 64 BIT



Re: Graphics

Postby jfg69 » Thu May 08, 2008 1:15 am

SaddleTramp wrote:ok...don't ya'll brag to hard just cuz ya beat me :lol:
nVidia GeForce 6150LE (onboard chip)

7920 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1583.864 FPS
8346 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1669.089 FPS
8369 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1673.675 FPS
8337 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1667.011 FPS


Well, SaddleTramp, were running about the same. My pathetic numbers are as follows..

Code: Select all
8421 frames in 5.1 seconds = 1655.995 FPS
8439 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1687.790 FPS
8474 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1694.789 FPS
8545 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1708.839 FPS
8525 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1704.912 FPS


I dont understand why my rates are so damn low.. its running the same with or without a seperate board. Granted, the board is roughly the same as the on-board, but I figured it would have picked up quite a bit with the x64 and the sep board, no? Unless I need to use different drivers than what envy loaded for me.
Image

Image
User avatar
jfg69
Site Admin
 
Posts: 365
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:15 pm
Location: Long Island, New York - USA
Age: 58
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 2.8 32 BIT



Re: Graphics

Postby SaddleTramp » Thu May 08, 2008 2:49 am

jfg69 wrote:
SaddleTramp wrote:ok...don't ya'll brag to hard just cuz ya beat me :lol:
nVidia GeForce 6150LE (onboard chip)

7920 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1583.864 FPS
8346 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1669.089 FPS
8369 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1673.675 FPS
8337 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1667.011 FPS


Well, SaddleTramp, were running about the same. My pathetic numbers are as follows..

Code: Select all
8421 frames in 5.1 seconds = 1655.995 FPS
8439 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1687.790 FPS
8474 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1694.789 FPS
8545 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1708.839 FPS
8525 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1704.912 FPS


I dont understand why my rates are so damn low.. its running the same with or without a seperate board. Granted, the board is roughly the same as the on-board, but I figured it would have picked up quite a bit with the x64 and the sep board, no? Unless I need to use different drivers than what envy loaded for me.

I know that with onboard graphics (and please understand I only speak from my understanding of it in what follows) the whole 'video memory' deal works in a 'mysterious' way (to me)...the specs of mine say that I have 512MB of Vid memory...ok, where?? LOL This is my first 'commercial' system as opposed to all systems I've had in the past I built myself. So on this integrated sys, I've never figured out how to manipulate the vid memory. I don't really think there would be that much difference, if any, in the drivers. You may be able to compare the drivers by looking at the driver file properties for version, build, etc... there might be a clue there...but to be honest, this 'integrated' onboard stuff still has me snowballed...sorry I couldn't be more help to ya...
3 Rules: 1. Research; 2. Read; 3. Repeat 1 & 2
HP Pavilion a1700n; Asus A8M2N-LA; AMD Athlon X2 3800+ 2GHz; 2GB DDR2 PC2-5300 Mem; nForce 430 Chipset
GeForce GT220 1gb PCIE16
Sound Blaster Audigy2
Samsung 250GB SATA, WD 320GB SATA, WD 500GB 'GREEN' SATA
TSST DVDRW 16X DL; ASUS DRW-2014S1 DVDRW/DL 20X
Ultimate Edition 2.4 x64
Image
User avatar
SaddleTramp
U.E. God
U.E. God
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: NC, US
Age: 63
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.2 64 BIT



Re: Graphics

Postby Cab » Thu May 08, 2008 9:34 am

I'm heading off to work but quickly on board video cards use part of system memory. You can usually set how much to use in the BIOS. Thats a quick and dirty no time to look up your board but will try back after work tonight.
Cab
Mother Board: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO WIFI
CPU: AMD 2700X
Memory: 32GB CORSAIR PRO RGB @3200
Video Card: EVGA GTX1080 FTW
Hard Drives: 1TB Network Drive, 1TB 860 EVO SSD, 1TB 970 EVO M.2
I'm in Southern New Mexico, USA (not Mexico)
Image
User avatar
Cab
Site Admin
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 2:06 pm
Location: New Mexico, USA
Age: 52
Operating System: Ultimate Edition Beta Tester



Re: Graphics

Postby drama » Thu May 08, 2008 11:26 am

you all got me beat. but my numbers are rising. thought id post some newer numbers.

Code: Select all
jeremy@deadlly-soundz-07:~$ glxgears
6521 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1304.094 FPS
6530 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1305.805 FPS
6521 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1304.114 FPS
6530 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1305.926 FPS
6525 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1304.983 FPS


im up about 170fps from what my numbers were back in november. not sure if thats due to using a newer version of Ultimate Edition or if the ati drivers are actually getting better performance wise. could be a combo of both.
radeon x200 integrated (64mb)

some of my the ati users wanna try this one (not sure if it works with nvidia or not)

Code: Select all
fgl_glxgears


would be interesting to see what everyone else is getting. i kno ya will all beat me here too tho.numbers will be lower than regular glxgears but thats due to the fact that its more intensive

Code: Select all
jeremy@deadlly-soundz-07:~$ fgl_glxgears
Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
1284 frames in 5.0 seconds = 256.800 FPS
1269 frames in 5.0 seconds = 253.800 FPS
1256 frames in 5.0 seconds = 251.200 FPS
1275 frames in 5.0 seconds = 255.000 FPS
1270 frames in 5.0 seconds = 254.000 FPS
ULTIMATE EDITION 2.5 X64/ARCHLINUX X64 DUAL BOOT
Antec 900two case
3 antec 120mm tri cool blue led fans (1 rear exaust 2 front intake)
1 antec 220mm "bigboy" tri cool blue led fan (top exaust)
Amd Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Am3 Cpu OC'D @ 4.2 Rev C3
MSI NF980-G65 Am3 Socket DDR3 Tri-sli ATX Mainboard
Nvidia 980A Sli Chipset
Corsair 2GB Dual Channel ram (1GBx2) DDR3 @ 1600 MHZ
EVGA Nvidia GTS-250 1GB PCI Express Graphics Card
Lite-On Dual Layer Sata Dvd Burner
3x 1TB Seagate Sata Hdd's 32Mb cache
ASUS VH235 23 Inch Lcd Wide Screen Monitor
OCZ ModXStream Pro 700Watt Psu
Rosewill 3.5" Internal USB 2.0 Card Reader w/ Floppy Drive
User avatar
drama
U.E. Master
U.E. Master
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:26 am
Location: eastern iowa, united states
Age: 38
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.2 32 BIT



Re: Graphics

Postby SaddleTramp » Thu May 08, 2008 11:36 am

Cab wrote:I'm heading off to work but quickly on board video cards use part of system memory. You can usually set how much to use in the BIOS. Thats a quick and dirty no time to look up your board but will try back after work tonight.
Cab

Naw sir...Phoenix AwardBIOS 5.07 (03/19/2007); Core Ver 6; Build ID 71NAv3PrA2; oh yeah...and it's HP proprietary. Very limited what I can do in it...Did I mention I'm starting to despise name brand systems ?!? :evil: After always building my own, and with this being my first OEM system, hard to get use to being so limited,.,but hey, like a famous poet once said, "...NEVERMORE". You can bet 'your next mule ride down the Grand Canyon' before the end of the year, I'll be back in there with my own custom system!!! 8-)
There may be some pin settings on the MB I might be able to change around, but I'm not really going to worry about it. My movies and audio plays good and smooth, system overall performs good enough to let me spend more time learning about *nix and Ultimate Edition, no major problems with anything I've throwed on here (even had that triple boot going on awhile back :mrgreen: )...so bottom line, life's pretty good and I'm just trying to help where I can :D Appreciate the idea tho' ;) Might be something that jfg could look into tho'...catch ya'll later :arrow: :arrow: :arrow:
3 Rules: 1. Research; 2. Read; 3. Repeat 1 & 2
HP Pavilion a1700n; Asus A8M2N-LA; AMD Athlon X2 3800+ 2GHz; 2GB DDR2 PC2-5300 Mem; nForce 430 Chipset
GeForce GT220 1gb PCIE16
Sound Blaster Audigy2
Samsung 250GB SATA, WD 320GB SATA, WD 500GB 'GREEN' SATA
TSST DVDRW 16X DL; ASUS DRW-2014S1 DVDRW/DL 20X
Ultimate Edition 2.4 x64
Image
User avatar
SaddleTramp
U.E. God
U.E. God
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: NC, US
Age: 63
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.2 64 BIT



Re: Graphics

Postby drama » Thu May 08, 2008 11:57 am

i feel you on the deal with hp. mines the same way. they basically crippled it. the only option if you wanna use all that extra vram is to mod the bios. not for the weak of heart trust me. thats what i had to do with mine. mine supported a max of 64mb but they locked it at 32mb. removed ram timings. cpu voltage fsb ect (all the oc stuff). basically a whole bunch of crap. i have mine TOTALLY unlocked now. but like i said its not something i would really advise to do. you can turn you board into a brick if its done wrong.

if you do mod it though i claim no responsibility. make sure you do your homework.
ULTIMATE EDITION 2.5 X64/ARCHLINUX X64 DUAL BOOT
Antec 900two case
3 antec 120mm tri cool blue led fans (1 rear exaust 2 front intake)
1 antec 220mm "bigboy" tri cool blue led fan (top exaust)
Amd Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Am3 Cpu OC'D @ 4.2 Rev C3
MSI NF980-G65 Am3 Socket DDR3 Tri-sli ATX Mainboard
Nvidia 980A Sli Chipset
Corsair 2GB Dual Channel ram (1GBx2) DDR3 @ 1600 MHZ
EVGA Nvidia GTS-250 1GB PCI Express Graphics Card
Lite-On Dual Layer Sata Dvd Burner
3x 1TB Seagate Sata Hdd's 32Mb cache
ASUS VH235 23 Inch Lcd Wide Screen Monitor
OCZ ModXStream Pro 700Watt Psu
Rosewill 3.5" Internal USB 2.0 Card Reader w/ Floppy Drive
User avatar
drama
U.E. Master
U.E. Master
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:26 am
Location: eastern iowa, united states
Age: 38
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.2 32 BIT

PreviousNext

Return to Benchmarks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron