Page 3 of 11

Re: Graphics

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:39 am
by TheeMahn
DaddyX3 wrote:This is getting funny! :lol: "You guys don't want none"



I banned him twice yesterday, we have fun like that if he can find a way to ban me believe it he will ;)

Re: Graphics

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:38 am
by jfg69
DaddyX3 wrote:
jfg69 wrote:Hmmm... ran it again from 1.6- extremely unimpressive, even moreso than from my 1.4 install :oops:

Code: Select all
4196 frames in 5.0 seconds = 838.880 FPS
4165 frames in 5.0 seconds = 832.841 FPS
4029 frames in 5.0 seconds = 805.728 FPS
4280 frames in 5.0 seconds = 855.987 FPS
4263 frames in 5.0 seconds = 852.347 FPS


wtf is THAT all about?.. $#!% drivers for 7.10 ?

what chipset do you have?


Its a foxconn (winfast) motherboard w/ onboard nv6100... Also running my old slow ram (PC2100), which has nothing to do with this, I believe..

Re: Graphics

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:04 pm
by TheeMahn
jfg69 wrote:
DaddyX3 wrote:
jfg69 wrote:Hmmm... ran it again from 1.6- extremely unimpressive, even moreso than from my 1.4 install :oops:

Code: Select all
4196 frames in 5.0 seconds = 838.880 FPS
4165 frames in 5.0 seconds = 832.841 FPS
4029 frames in 5.0 seconds = 805.728 FPS
4280 frames in 5.0 seconds = 855.987 FPS
4263 frames in 5.0 seconds = 852.347 FPS


wtf is THAT all about?.. $#!% drivers for 7.10 ?

what chipset do you have?


Its a foxconn (winfast) motherboard w/ onboard nv6100... Also running my old slow ram (PC2100), which has nothing to do with this, I believe..


Shared ram for video?

Re: Graphics

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:13 pm
by DaddyX3
my thoughts exactly, have you configured it to use all the shared memory allowable by the chipset in dpkg-reconfigure xorg-config ? (If you have anything setup special in xorg.conf , using the dpkg-reconfigure xorg-config will overwrite them) so you might want to make a xorg.conf_backup if you need to transfer over some of the settings.

Re: Graphics

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:14 pm
by jfg69
TheeMahn wrote:
jfg69 wrote:
Its a foxconn (winfast) motherboard w/ onboard nv6100... Also running my old slow ram (PC2100), which has nothing to do with this, I believe..




Shared ram for video?





Probably...256K I think..., but on the bios screen on boot i see something that says 64mb, but it dont stay up long enough to read...
here is a review of the board, I am in midst of reading it and doing a hundred other things before work..
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/280

Re: Graphics

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:30 pm
by TheeMahn
jfg69 wrote:
TheeMahn wrote:
jfg69 wrote:
Its a foxconn (winfast) motherboard w/ onboard nv6100... Also running my old slow ram (PC2100), which has nothing to do with this, I believe..




Shared ram for video?





Probably...256K I think..., but on the bios screen on boot i see something that says 64mb, but it dont stay up long enough to read...
here is a review of the board, I am in midst of reading it and doing a hundred other things before work..
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/280


As the review states:
Figure 1, it has one 16x PCI Express slot, allowing you to disable its on-board video and install a real video card later, if you want.

If it was me I would want to ;)

Re: Graphics

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:31 pm
by DaddyX3
jfg69 wrote:
TheeMahn wrote:
jfg69 wrote:
Its a foxconn (winfast) motherboard w/ onboard nv6100... Also running my old slow ram (PC2100), which has nothing to do with this, I believe..




Shared ram for video?





Probably...256K I think..., but on the bios screen on boot i see something that says 64mb, but it dont stay up long enough to read...
here is a review of the board, I am in midst of reading it and doing a hundred other things before work..
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/280

Well actually, It does share the memory. so running an "old slow ram" you will get the results of it. I would just check out that you are utilizing your shared - onboard graphics to its full capabilities.

Re: Graphics

PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:01 am
by spider
Code: Select all
33270 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6653.925 FPS
33673 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6734.587 FPS
33654 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6729.581 FPS
33675 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6734.864 FPS


GeForce 7600GT PCIE, Running Dual 19" Samsung SyncMaster 940N Flat Panels in Twin View.

Re: Graphics

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 8:45 am
by sumone75
Code: Select all
Xlib:  extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":1.0".
10426 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2081.437 FPS
11526 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2296.311 FPS
11384 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2257.568 FPS
11300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2242.926 FPS


not sure what the XFree86 is but this is with my x200 onboard

Re: Graphics

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:36 am
by cristof1913
Code: Select all
27032 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5406.240 FPS
25855 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5170.939 FPS
27430 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5485.956 FPS
27387 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5477.389 FPS
27220 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5443.870 FPS


An Ati Mobility Radeon X1600 with 256Mb of GDDR3 VRAM