Are you a spammer

Please note, that the first 3 posts you make, will need to be approved by a forum Administrator or Moderator before they are publicly viewable.
Each application to join this forum is checked at the Stop Forum Spam website. If the email or IP address appears there when checked, you will not be allowed to join this forum.
If you get past this check and post spam on this forum, your posts will be immediately deleted and your account inactivated.You will then be banned and your IP will be submitted to your ISP, notifying them of your spamming. So your spam links will only be seen for an hour or two at most. In other words, don't waste your time and ours.

This forum is for the use and enjoyment of the members and visitors looking to learn about and share information regarding the topics listed. It is not a free-for-all advertising venue. Your time would be better spent pursuing legitimate avenues of promoting your websites.

Ultimate Android?

Android phones and bounds.....chat about it here.


Re: Ultimate Android?

Postby Xanayoshi » Sat Nov 10, 2012 2:01 am

don't get me wrong..I am all about the 64..I just think we should step back and not let Microsoft force us there.
Image

And now, the completely true facts, as told by an anonymous man hiding behind a screen name:

Packard Bell Pack Mate II 286 Intel 80286 1MB RAM
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Xanayoshi
Moderator
 
Posts: 1564
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:46 pm
Location: Kitsap County
Age: 45
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.4 32 BIT



Re: Ultimate Android?

Postby Xanayoshi » Sat Nov 10, 2012 2:21 am

If Samsung and Amazon have taught us anything, it is to not (to emphatically mess) with Google. Google is named after a very large number. Best not to (emphatically mess) with them. The original Google Nexus is still about the most awesome thing you can get your hands on though. After that would be the Motorola Droid and then the geeks dream in a box HTC EVO. Is the HTC ONE X the answer to combining the Android and common Linux experience? NO. To me that is like..getting a super awesome portable computer that kind of does....wow! and turning it into a uhhhhhhh
Image

And now, the completely true facts, as told by an anonymous man hiding behind a screen name:

Packard Bell Pack Mate II 286 Intel 80286 1MB RAM
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Xanayoshi
Moderator
 
Posts: 1564
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:46 pm
Location: Kitsap County
Age: 45
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.4 32 BIT



Re: Ultimate Android?

Postby Micro » Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:25 pm

Anyone mess with SUSE's new arm build? might be worth taking a look see...
Image
https://www.linkedin.com/in/josephperrello
Thermaltake Series Core X9 SPCC E-ATX Cube Case
CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 64GB Quad Channel DDR4
EVGA 120-G1-0750-XR 80 PLUS GOLD 750W PSU
APC BR1300G Back-UPS Pro 780W/1300VA UPS
ASRock X99 Extreme4 LGA X99 Motherboard
OC-Intel Core i7-5820K @ 4.1GHz × 12
Corsair H100i V2 CPU Cooler. 240mm
Kernel Linux 4.6.4-1-ARCH x86_64
MATE Desktop Environment 1.12.1
OS - SAMSUNG 950 PRO M.2 512GB
DATA - 2 SSD 840 EVO RAID 0
MEDIA - 4 HDD 3TB RAID 0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX750 Ti
ViewSonic PJD7820HD
OS - Filesystem F2FS
Arch Linux
User avatar
Micro
Site Admin
 
Posts: 485
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:16 pm
Age: 46
Operating System: Other Linux



Re: Ultimate Android?

Postby Xanayoshi » Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:30 pm

I'm so close to just buying a whole bunch of Chinese Android knockoffs just to get my hands on cheap SOC to see where I want to go with that. Yeah, I can use my Androids, I have enough, but I was more interested in remoting the SOC with those than reprogramming phones. Mainly, I am not sure where I want to invest in my PC. I have no interest in buying any more video and sound cards. HDD either unless it's straight RAID.
Image

And now, the completely true facts, as told by an anonymous man hiding behind a screen name:

Packard Bell Pack Mate II 286 Intel 80286 1MB RAM
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Xanayoshi
Moderator
 
Posts: 1564
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:46 pm
Location: Kitsap County
Age: 45
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.4 32 BIT



Re: Ultimate Android?

Postby pch.shot » Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:07 am

Systems Windows XP Pro 32 bit & various Linux in Virtual Box and VMWare Player
Intel i7 2600K cpu with built in Intel 3000 video
1 OCZ Vertex 3 120 gig ssd(System)
1 Western Digital 2 Terabyte Green internal hard drive(Storage)
Kingston ddr3 1333 ram(4 gig)
MSI Z68A-GD80(G3)mobo w/hdmi video and optical audio
Realtek HD audio
Realtek lan
1 LG sata optical drive
Antec Sonata IV case/620 watt psu
50 inch LG plasma tv/monitor
Sony surround sound amp
Axiom speakers
optical sound
User avatar
pch.shot
U.E. God
U.E. God
 
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:28 pm
Location: Chippawa, Canada
Age: 69
Operating System: Microsoft Windows



Re: Ultimate Android?

Postby Xanayoshi » Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:44 am

Yes..definitely there pc...but in what way? RAM is not determined by it's place on a motherboard. I mean..it is..but, not how I wish to utilise it. That sounds confusing..I mean to use ssd for it's purpose. Maybe. I wish I could think in words lmao. Ugh, see what no education will get ya?
Image

And now, the completely true facts, as told by an anonymous man hiding behind a screen name:

Packard Bell Pack Mate II 286 Intel 80286 1MB RAM
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Xanayoshi
Moderator
 
Posts: 1564
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:46 pm
Location: Kitsap County
Age: 45
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.4 32 BIT



Re: Ultimate Android?

Postby Xanayoshi » Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:18 am

"x64 is misleading. The x86_64 still uses the underlying architecture and instruction set of the original Intel 8086. [wikipedia.org]. Changing the name to x64 would imply the instruction set is different from that of x86 - and while the instruction set has been extended it still (as far as I know) still support the instructions designed in the 70s."


this is kind of what i mean...its just...aaargh

this is from
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/08/2 ... chitecture
Image

And now, the completely true facts, as told by an anonymous man hiding behind a screen name:

Packard Bell Pack Mate II 286 Intel 80286 1MB RAM
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Xanayoshi
Moderator
 
Posts: 1564
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:46 pm
Location: Kitsap County
Age: 45
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.4 32 BIT



Re: Ultimate Android?

Postby vicodincat » Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:06 pm

Would it be totally awesome to have Ultimate Edition 3.5 on my android.. I can install regular ubuntu but it doesn't even come close to Ultimate Edition.. I would love that.. I can just imagine, Gnome on my droid with the compiz fire effects and all of the Ultimate Edition goodness right on my phone.. One day maybe...

<BREW>
HP-Compaq CQ-57 489WM
1.30GHZ AMD E-300 APU with Radeon HD Graphics × 2
5.4 GiB DDR3 RAM
Release Ubuntu 12.04 (precise)
Kernel 3.8.8-030808-generic
GNOME 3.4.2
GCC version 4.7 (x86_64-linux-gnu)
Xorg version 1.11.3 (11 April 2013 01:05:39PM)



*ASK12B1*
*If it is to be, it's up to me.*
*We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.*




Image
User avatar
vicodincat
Moderator
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:52 pm
Location: Palm Springs, California
Age: 44
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.5 64 BIT



Re: Ultimate Android?

Postby Xanayoshi » Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:24 pm

Micro wrote:Anyone mess with SUSE's new arm build? might be worth taking a look see...


Won't fit on my screen with my Philips, I can SSH of course, but that's not the direction I want to take at the moment. Going to run with Arch instead, just have to take a day off for the installation...maybe two.

However...I have gotten some theming from Ultimate set on Gnome Classic through Bodhi. I am thinking that if I can get a decent quad ARM I am going to be able to make miracles. Still, it is an emulation at heart, but I guess I will just have to live with it. I kind of get the impression Canonical is just waiting to see what everybody else does with ARM(DEBIANDEBIANDEBIAN) and then copy and set it up for Amazon.

Honestly though, I keep coming to the conclusion that Ubuntu is an extra step.
Image

And now, the completely true facts, as told by an anonymous man hiding behind a screen name:

Packard Bell Pack Mate II 286 Intel 80286 1MB RAM
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Xanayoshi
Moderator
 
Posts: 1564
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:46 pm
Location: Kitsap County
Age: 45
Operating System: Ultimate Edition 3.4 32 BIT



Re: Ultimate Android?

Postby Micro » Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:33 pm

Indeed it is. Just like stepping on something thats already been stepped on. A logical disaster... :)
Image
https://www.linkedin.com/in/josephperrello
Thermaltake Series Core X9 SPCC E-ATX Cube Case
CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 64GB Quad Channel DDR4
EVGA 120-G1-0750-XR 80 PLUS GOLD 750W PSU
APC BR1300G Back-UPS Pro 780W/1300VA UPS
ASRock X99 Extreme4 LGA X99 Motherboard
OC-Intel Core i7-5820K @ 4.1GHz × 12
Corsair H100i V2 CPU Cooler. 240mm
Kernel Linux 4.6.4-1-ARCH x86_64
MATE Desktop Environment 1.12.1
OS - SAMSUNG 950 PRO M.2 512GB
DATA - 2 SSD 840 EVO RAID 0
MEDIA - 4 HDD 3TB RAID 0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX750 Ti
ViewSonic PJD7820HD
OS - Filesystem F2FS
Arch Linux
User avatar
Micro
Site Admin
 
Posts: 485
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:16 pm
Age: 46
Operating System: Other Linux

PreviousNext

Return to Android Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests